Filter By

The Right to Retail: Can localism save Britain’s small retailers?

A new ResPublica report urges Government to empower communities to rebalance the UK’s retail economy.

The report, which has been reported on by the Guardian, ConservativeHome, The Grocer, Platform10, Regeneration and Renewal, The Retail Bulletin and Scotland on Sunday, argues that the Government must give communities the power to rebalance the retail economy away from the ‘Big Four’ supermarkets, which control nearly 80 per cent of the UK’s £150 billion pound grocery market.

The radical plans contained within a 55 page report on the future of small shops are being unveiled by the influential centre-right think tank ResPublica. The report urges Ministers to give sweeping new powers to town halls to protect local shops.

Controversially the report proposes new tax raising powers on large out-of-town shops with the money being used to slash business rates on small retailers.

The report The Right to Retail – Can localism save Britain’s small retailers, by Adam Schoenborn, argues that the Government must do more to rebalance the retail economy.

And it sets out a raft of policy ideas which are designed to encourage new models of retail including mutuals, level the playing field between large and small retailers, rebalance the retail sector away from the ‘Big Four’ and reverse the decline of the high street.

“Britain every year is less and less a nation of shopkeepers – assets and ownership are concentrating, finance has become the preserve of the City of London and high streets have converged as though by centralised design,” says the report.

“The UK’s 8151 supermarket outlets today account for 97 per cent of total grocery sales, and 76 per cent of groceries are sold by just the four biggest retailers.

“When we talk about rebalancing the economy, what we are really talking about is shifting back the locus of ownership and economic control to communities. The goal and evidence of a genuinely new economic settlement, of any political stripe, must be the end of this declining trend in popular ownership. The challenge of the next settlement – in the retail industry as in the economy at large – will be embedding the small and the local owner into our economy, without compromising competitiveness or consumer benefits.”

Phillip Blond Director of ResPublica added, “The number of traditional grocery stores has been declining over many years. In 1950 there were around 90,000 butchers and greengrocers. By 2000 this figure had plummeted to fewer than 20,000. The number of bakeries has fared only slightly better declining from around 25,000 to 8,000 over the same period.

“The rise of these vast supermarkets, with the infrastructure needed to sustain them, a bias in the planning system and their enormous purchasing power has crowded out competition. These developments have made it impossible for small retailers to grow. We now have a situation where it is unimaginable that a small family owned shop could grow into a retailing powerhouse like Tesco, or Sainsbury.”

The report welcomes the political developments in Scotland and Northern Ireland where levies on large retailers are actively being debated. It says “these could offer a model for micro-redistribution at a local level.”

But, while it urges the Coalition to look closely at these proposals, it insists that any money raised in tax on the big stores should be used to cut the tax burden on smaller shops. It also argues that there should be a clear distinction between out of town stores and in town shops.

“As the Government considers mechanisms for a new system for Business Rates and Government Grant, it should consider allowing significantly more flexibility in the local distribution of business rates. By designating a business as a significant community asset through the mechanisms established in the Localism Bill, the community would enable their Local Authority to issue a standard level of business rate relief to the business.”

The report concludes that the dominance of the sector by just four retailers is not a sign of a properly functioning market and without the radical changes outlined in the report entrepreneurs and communities will find entry to the market all but impossible.

Key recommendations from the report include:

1. Allow Communities to designate retail mix in Neighbourhood Plans
2. A Community Right to Appeal
3. Treat shops as local assets
4. Business rate reduction for designated retailers
5. A Community Right to Buy
6. A Community Right to Try
7. Embed small and medium owners in Local Enterprise Partnerships
8. A Community Interest Clause
9. An annual national report on “buying power” and “price flexing”
10. Encourage mutual retail models
11. Encourage community-run retailers

Comments on: The Right to Retail: Can localism save Britain’s small retailers?

Gravatar James Mall 11 June 2011
Phil Clarke the new chief executive of Tesco has just reported "the company will double the number of shops where shoppers can order non-food items via the web and pick them up in-store. It will also add clothing to these 'click and collect' operations.
And some people think small corner stores can compete in this 21st century reality. Delusional.

Price, ease, parking, range of products will wipe out the High Street as we knew it. And rightly so. High Streets are ugly, dirty, third rate largely, expensive, costly parking unwanted by most as the figures suggest. Most consumers do not want this old fashioned shopping experience.

High Streets needs to reinvent themselves as cafe society, meeting places, talking shops, internet communications people places; the 21st century versions of the 17th/18th century coffe shops. Pining after dirty, expensive, limited range
convenience shops is whistling against the wind of history.
Protecting town centre shops at the expense of local ratepayers
will prove yet another costly Red Tory failure.
Reply
Gravatar Dave Wilson 05 June 2011
Good old Mark Macho! And Malcolm Rasala! It's great to hear such forthright and uncompromising views, I just hope and pray that they're not politicians or else we might all be in the proverbial (that idea about selling excrement to industry might come in handy again).

Whatever happened to social conscience?

The plain fact is that unregulated or poorly regulated capitalism would be a disaster for everyone (see banking industry) and, ultimately, would result in less choice, poorer value and massive unemployment. Not good for any of us.

It's already happening in retail. The 'big four' bribe their way into areas where they are not needed (or wanted) with hard cash and the promise of jobs. Local businesses fold, diversity is severly reduced and there is a net loss of employment; older people, the less well off and needy are left stranded in 'ghost' communities.

Karnak says, "no one but a tiny minority want 'community' schemes. If they did they would set them up." Sometimes, society needs to look at what is good for the whole and act on its behalf. Fortunately, philanthropy is still alive and well in the western world.
Reply
Gravatar Mark Macho 18 May 2011
Farmers are already subsidized, Ken. No one gives topup
money to miners or Tesco workers so they can continue
in the manner to which they are accustomed.

Markets are rough places. It was that way for your father and
grandfather too but you were a child and didn't notice.
Things change.

Time was when every man wore a felt hat and
every gentleman a wig. We are not mourning the loss of these
businesses.If you want things like parks for your children
you will have to do what your fathers did and plan, lobby
and campaign for them. Do you think they just happened?
Pushed to the brink? Go visit someone
poor in the third world. Many of them are making the goods
we enjoy in our world at cheap prices.Make them here
and you may not be able to afford them at all.

Most conservatives are appalled at redistibutive taxes when they are rich ,but suddenly converted to them when financial disaster strikes.

No one was worried in Britain when Africa's best farmland was
bought up or taken by force by white foreigners.

Businesses that no longer make money have to change. And
the change is often doing something else. It is rather
unlikely that people will pay to keep up ways of doing things
whose results they do not want except in a theme park context.

People used to pick up dog excrement in London to sell to
industry. They no longer do. We adjusted. If people could
avoid painful change they would. But who would pay? And,would
it be good practice to keep on doing things the old way?
Want to throw away your mobile for a messenger boy?

New situations present new opportunities. Small shops can
still be very successful. Last time I looked Prada was doing OK!
Yes ,it's a struggle, but it always was. Ask Xerox.
Remember when you made a trip to one of their machines
to copy your school report? Would you recommend some finance
for those poor souls who grew rich making Kodak film?

We can all cry in our beer but the future is crafted in the present, and the present is made by those who live in it.
Reply
Gravatar Malcolm Rasala 18 May 2011
"We don't all want to work for Tesco or Sainsbury". Well don't work for them. But do not try and distort the market by telling the vast majority of consumers in Britain where they can or cannot shop.

"How do you think the farmer feels when the majors dictate what price they want to buy goods at, or the cloths manufactures" They do not have to sell their goods to Asda, Tesco's if they do not want to. If you think small dirty little convenience stores do not use the market to buy goods and set prices you are deluding yourself.

"They will not have any choices if they have no one else to sell to". Nonsense. They can export. They can sell to the nasty, dirty expensive little corner shops you so love and which still unfortunately scar our land.

"They will be running at a loss". Its called capitalism. Are you against capitalism?

Like the banks being too powerful. They just stick there figures up to the governments and say "you got no choice we can do what we want". Absolutely. Governments come and go. Nobody elects a government to mess with what is popular like shopping in supermarkets

"I don't want to only shop in one place. Because I haven't got a choice or cant park anywhere". Well dont. Use your local
smelly, flithy little corner shops. But don't ask for laws to
make others follow your bizarre little ideas

" don't want to see children spending most of there leisure time infront of a games consel cos there are no parks". Who cares. Kids want consoles. They will simply pass you by. And we have parks, until of course Conservatives conjure up their Big Society nonsense to sell them off to their rich friends as they
want to do with our forests

"I don't want my kids to think they could never be self employed in retail or any related business because whats the point they will never be able to grow as a business or make money". Are you for real. How do you think Asda (Wal*Mart) started?. Have you not heard of Sam Walton and how he started with one store? Or Jack Cohen and his one store Tesco? Or Marks and Spencer and their barrow. Or Sainsbury? Or Jesse Boots? You
appear deeply unread Ken. If you want to defeat your enemy 'supermarkets' you seriously need to do some reading and research and know your enemy.

"These are the realities that unfortunately confront us in the 21st century. If I am being nostalgic,then so be it.People are being squeezed to the brink. All the major retailers are making huge profits. There not dropping there price there just selling it differently to you "Buy two for the price of one" Bull........" Golly what a concatanation of illiterate nonsenses. If you do not like buy two for the price of one don't. Period. As for 'huge profits' golly Ken you are so unread one wants to cry. Why not start reading the Financial Times and get some knowledge in that head of yours. You are uttering codswallop.

"I don't want to see Tesco or Asda go to the wall". Such ignorance! Check Tesco's 'Fresh & Fresher' in the USA. Check Asda (Wal*Marts) withdrawal from Germany. Again you are talking total nonsense Ken.

"I just think that there should be a more equal plain for smaller retailors, giving consumers a wider choice. If cyber space is where you want your community tobe Malcolm. Good luck".
It is where it is Ken. Open your eyes. Do you not have a PC? Do you not use the internet? Do you not have a mobile phone? Everyone else does. You sound like a little Luddite. Better go and hide yourself away in the middle of a large forest as a hermit. Your thoughts are ridiculous and deeply unintelligent.
Reply
Gravatar ken izli 17 May 2011
We don't all want to work for Tesco or Sainsbury. How do you think the farmer feels when the majors dictate what price they want to buy goods at, or the cloths manufactures. They will not have any choices if they have no one else to sell to.They will be running at a loss. Like the banks being too powerful. They just stick there figures up to the governments and say "you got no choice we can do what we want".
I don't want to only shop in one place. Because I haven't got a choice or cant park anywhere. I don't want to see children spending most of there leisure time infront of a games consel cos there are no parks. I don't want my kids to think they could never be self employed in retail or any related business because whats the point they will never be able to grow as a business or make money. These are the realities that unfortunately confront us in the 21st century.If I am being nostalgic,then so be it.
People are being squeezed to the brink. All the major retailers are making huge profits. There not dropping there price there just selling it differently to you "Buy two for the price of one" Bull........
I don't want to see Tesco or Asda go to the wall. I just think that there should be a more equal plain for smaller retailors, giving consumers a wider choice. If cyber space is where you want your community tobe Malcolm. Good luck.
Reply
Gravatar Malcolm Rasala 17 May 2011
What has Coter been imbibing? Talk about dumb and dumber. You mean people will give up shopping at Sainsbury and Tesco to shop at small, dirty little community convenience stores? People will buy their furniture at
tiny expensive corner shops rather than out of town Habitats. In your dreams. Asda is the 3rd largest retailer
of clothes. You think their consumers are going to shop in small, limited range little community shops?

And why this obsession about community? The BBC ran a two hour programme yesterday on a community trying to provide services to themselves rather than from a top down council. Result utter disaster. Higher costs. Worse services. Profound unhappiness by everyone involved. Lesson: nobody wants this fairytale community nonsense. It is romantic rubbish of low intellect.

Lesson 2; no way can you square the circle of "embedding the small and the local owner into our economy, without compromising competitiveness or consumer benefits" Can't be done. Will not be done. Tesco's will eat them alive and brilliantly. So will Morrisons. And Asda etc etc.

And where is the evidence that anybody wants a return to this 19th century rose tinted land? You mean people will wish to park their cars vast distances away from their places of shopping rather than park right outside Tesco's. Dream on.

Stop hitting the bottle. This is the 21st century. Get over it. Right wing social engineering of 'shifting back the locus of ownership and economic control to communities' is specious think-tank claptrap and will be shunned by everyone as hilarious and ludicrous. What are you going to do dragoon families to shop in dirty, hideous town centres when they can drive to their nearest easy to use and park out of town shopping malls. Pleeeease come into the 21st century. No one, repeat no one wants to 'go back to the locus of ownership and economic control of communities'. Where is the evidence? Have a vote. Ask a community if it wants to close down its Asda or Tesco's etc to be replaced by little limited range community shops. You must shop at Oxfam.
Reply
Gravatar coter 17 May 2011
When we talk about rebalancing the economy, 70-686 test what we are really talking about is shifting back the locus of ownership and economic control to communities. The goal and evidence of a genuinely new economic settlement, of any political stripe, must be the end of this declining trend in popular ownership.70-270 test The challenge of the next settlement – in the retail industry as in the economy at large – will be embedding the small and the local owner into our economy, without compromising 70-433 test competitiveness or consumer benefits.”




Reply
Gravatar Karnak 28 April 2011
Retail Jobs suggests 'perhaps an alternative would be to develop regulation that encouraged (or forced) any locally based retailer to invest in that local area - either through preference of retail jobs or other schemes that would help the community' NONSENSE. Firstly the retailers that Brits show they like eg Tesco's, Morrisons, Sainsbury, Asda already 'invest' in the area paying rates, employing people etc. Secondly no one repeat no one
but a tiny minority want 'community' schemes. If they did they would set them up. This back to the supposed golden age of merry old England is pathetic juvenile tosh dreamed up by delusional romantics. It is deeply patronising, arrogant beyond belief, and intellectually specious.
Reply
Gravatar Mark Macho 28 April 2011
It is for people to decide what they want.
And they do. Why laws that will be expensive
and ineffective to compel them to do what they
do not want? Because some minority is losing
its advantage?! I thought you guys believed in
freedom and competition. Or were you under the false
impression that it would provide some fixed order?
If you think local sourcing is so great, get out
there and convince people. But remember to stay
home for your holidays and give up oranges and
bananas.You're not going to do that. Right?
That's why this whole discussion is piffle!
Local and imported are not contradictions anyway.
Even in the Bronze Age this country desired goods from abroad.
And so did evertone else. It's called trade.
Reply
Gravatar Retail Jobs 28 April 2011
Mark Macho has a very good point by saying that "People want
high quality low cost goods."

It's perhaps unfortunate, but the natural result of this is surely that shops with the best bulk buying power and extensive logistics will rise to the top in order to ensure low final costs and a range of worldwide foods in any season.

There's also the fact that time is scarce for many families (BBC report)... having everything under one roof is a significant benefit when families can only spend a couple of hours together after work.

Perhaps an alternative would be to develop regulation that encouraged (or forced) any locally based retailer to invest in that local area - either through preference of retail jobs or other schemes that would help the community.

What are your thoughts?
Reply
Gravatar 21st Century 23 April 2011
The Wedding. How it should be in the 21st Century:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kav0FEhtLug
Reply
Gravatar Karnak 21 April 2011
"Have the wisdom to abandon the values of a time that has passed. Pick out the constituents of the future" On the walls of the great Ancient Egyptian temples at Karnak and Luxor
Reply
Gravatar Mark Macho 19 April 2011
PS British ships have been transporting tea
from China and the camel caravans are going
bankrupt. Adopt a camel NOW!
Reply
Gravatar Mark Macho 19 April 2011
This is NOT changing the terms of debate. People want
high quality low cost goods. There is also a place
for luxury. But people have voted with their feet
and left high cost ,low quality, small scale in town retailing
when it comes to their major shop. Why constantly
fight human change with state intervention and subsidy.
If you serve the people then do so. What do you want me to do?
Go to some little market with no parking , no economy of scale
and a few hundred items?

If parking lots are ugly give them
lighting and fountains and trees. The twenty first century does not look like the 15th. Take the good, leave the bad and get creative. We are fans of capitalism. But we want it with a human face. That yesterday's business ideas are passe' is the
human story, not some tragedy. Get over it!

Stay tuned next week for how cars and trains have decimated the carriage trade!Queen leads the onward march with more stabling!
Reply
Gravatar Malcolm Rasala 19 April 2011
But where is the evidence that consumers want this? If 97 per cent of total grocery sales are catered for by the " UK’s 8151 supermarket outlets and 76 per cent of groceries are sold by just the four biggest retailers" what is wrong with this? Will consumers shop in more expensive in-town food stores? Small, often seedy town centre food shops are not where people want to shop. And they will not. This policy is surely doomed to fail.
Reply
Gravatar Julian Dobson 12 April 2011
I agree - a very timely report. But we need to recognise that independent retail is swimming against the tide of globalised supply chains and monopolistic muscle on the one hand, and shifting consumer habits (notably online shopping) on the other. Combined with the real decreases in consumer spending power we're now experiencing, it's hard to see how independent retail will survive in many places.

Planning and tax changes may help, but not once the market has gone. That's why the recommendations on community assets are welcome, especially the 'right to try'. This could be an important way of removing some of the risk associated with community ventures.

In the long term, though, I think we need to rethink town and neighbourhood shopping centres more radically to avoid long term decline, and to see retail as part of a much wider mix of social activities. I suggested some ideas in this post: http://urbanpollinators.co.uk/?p=415
Reply
Gravatar ken izli 11 April 2011
I think that this is a crusial report.This needed to be addressed many years ago. If the coalition is serious about the big community, It needs to give small business people a sense of fare play and hope. So that they can compete and not just work to survive.
Too many people have adopted the attitude of "Whats the point" I know from first hand experience. My father had a small grocery store for 32years. He was put out of business by the large chains. When he eventualy closed he said "the writing is on the wall.Shop keepers like me can not compete, its only a matter of time when supermarkets will be able to sell you anything"
We need to businesses a chance to prosper.
Reply

Join the discussion Have opinions on this matter? Why not get involved and comment on this below.

Become a Member Joining ResPublica give you an exclusive amount of features. Gain early access to ResPublica events, contribute to topics and much more.

Detailed Summary

Date Published
11 April 2011

About The Authors

Adam Schoenborn

Adam Schoenborn was a senior researcher for ResPublica from its foundation in 2009, until he moved to Canada in April 20...